Dallas Retirement Planning – Government
I received an email from my County Commissioner, Joe Jaynes. It highlights how government officials regardless of party affiliation (he is a Republican) will work to protect their own best interests, not the interest of those they were elected to serve.
I have posted the Joe Jaynes’ email first and my rant second. Enjoy and I hope you are getting involved with you local governments as well. – John Pollock
Dear Friends,
Today was the first day of the county budget workshop. I have to say this has been the most political and strangest budget that I have ever been associated with.
First of all, there has been severe misinformation sent out concerning the county retirement plan. I will address that issue in a future email.
First, however, the budget issue that we are facing tomorrow is the county tax rate. As many of you know, the Collin County tax rate is .2425 cents per $100 evaluation. An average Collin County homeowner pays approximately $500 per year in Collin County property taxes. This is approximately 9% of your total property tax rate.
For this amount, you get a criminal justice system, which is two-thirds of our budget, and over $1 billion in transportation projects.
I am happy to say that we have the lowest tax rate of the ten most populous counties and about the fifth lowest of all 254 counties in Texas.
The question is this: Should we lower it a quarter cent? If we do, the average Collin County homeowner will save approximately $5.50 per year. Yes, you read that right–$5.50 per year!
While lowering the tax rate may sound like a good idea, I believe it is shortsighted. Unfortunately, lowering the rate a quarter cent means that in our next bond election we be unable to construct another $25 million in roads.
So the question comes down to this: $5.50 a year per homeowner or $25,000,000 in road projects?
Also keep in mind that our population continues to grow. Land-wise, we are approximately 50% undeveloped. During the last year, as bad as it was economically, 53 people a day moved into Collin County and I am convinced that each of them brought at least two cars!
I am also a big believer that infrastructure investment translates into economic development which means more commercial tax base and, thus, less taxes on families.
I know it is short notice, but please let me know your thoughts. I have always enjoyed being your public servant and welcome your input.
Best,
Joe
————————-
Joe,
I for one am thrilled that something as mundane as the county budget is being politicized, I am happy for the exact reason, that is clear from your note below, that you have lost touch with why it is being politicized or don’t understand the basic tenets of economics (I am not talking Keynesian economics taught in our colleges, I’m talking the economics that actually work like Smith and Hayek). Since I will be posting this discussion on my blog (www.johnpollock.tv) I will explain why as a financial advisor, a business owner, employer, citizen and dad I am for keeping the $5.50 per year.
First let me unravel your reduction to the ridiculous strategy. I am not average, so I am automatically going to pay more than $5.50, apartment complexes, commercial buildings and other large productive members of our county are going to pay substantially more. Others will pay nothing at all. No one will pay the average tax because an average is part of the collective, not an individual tax. As for trying to make the case that me not paying my $5.50 will cost $25 million in roads?
Here is where government philosophy has gone awry on the national scale and where you have missed the mark locally. Individuals matter more than groups. Protecting the right of the individual to keep 50 cents or $50 should be paramount in the mind of our County Commissioner. Lowering the tax rate is NOT short sighted, it is a realization that governments can and should have to do with less, just like its citizens have had to do with less. It is also a realization that money in the hands of the private citizen will have a far bigger impact on driving growth than in the hands of any government entity, on any level. The county buildings are the nicest buildings in the county, the new court house would have never been built by a commercial free market company, because of its opulence and spectacular waste of space, that building could have been built for half the cost and it would have been built for less if it HAD to. The only way to force you and those that think like you to trim the fat is to give you less, because there is always a NEED for more and there is always a noble cause to fund.
“I am also a big believer that infrastructure investment translates into economic development which means more commercial tax base and, thus, less taxes on families.”
You may be a big believer in this, but it is not entirely true. First of all I am for infrastructure, but I am currently surrounded by empty buildings so not sure how pressing infrastructure is in the short term. Also, this is the same exact belief the Obama administration has and it has failed. Just like it failed during the great depression. From FDR’s Treasury Secretary in 1939, admitting the failure of The New Deal: “We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work… I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started … And an enormous debt to boot!” All that infrastructure did not yield growth. I guess the only thing I can learn from history is that politicians learn nothing from history.
So we have established your beliefs have not worked in recent history and they have not worked every time they are tried all through history. Here is my suggestion, your goal should be the absolute lowest not almost the lowest taxes of any county. I think striving to be the best in a category makes more sense. You do have kids don’t you? Are you telling them to strive to be almost the best, to settle for fifth best overall, but at least you are the best in this one category? Being the lowest will send a message to citizens all over the state that we are serious about curtailing government. The resulting growth will easily offset the $25 million that is “needed”. (What does $25 million in roads actually mean? 5 ft, 5 yards?)
Will this method take longer, yes, but that is how prudent businesses grows, they grow and then reinvest after growth to deal with the growth, it is messy in the short run and cleaner and smarter in the long run. I think you are the one being short sighted. So much so that I am requesting that you send me my $5.50 so that I can get the 5th best hamburger, go to the 5th best store or maybe give it to the 5th best candidate for County Commissioner, since I now know your target maybe that will even be you.
Sincerely,
John Pollock